Re: syscall numbers

Previous message: Seth Arnold: "Re: syscall numbers"
In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: syscall numbers"
Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: syscall numbers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

russellat_private

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 05:29, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > So what are we supposed to do until a replacement is devised?
>
> Common choices for userland/kernelland communication are ioctl,
> character devices, proc files, sysctl, and new filesystems. Greg is
> a strong proponent of new filesystems, and I think that it accurately
> represents the future direction of the Linux kernel.

You're missing the point.  I want SE Linux working on other platforms NOW.

I have already invented my own syscall numbers for other platforms to get this 
working.  I've attached the relevant kernel patch.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page