Re: syscall numbers

From: Russell Coker (russellat_private)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 03:06:21 PST

  • Next message: Oliver Tennert: "LSM adapted to support XFS (fwd)"

    On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 05:29, Seth Arnold wrote:
    > > So what are we supposed to do until a replacement is devised?
    >
    > Common choices for userland/kernelland communication are ioctl,
    > character devices, proc files, sysctl, and new filesystems. Greg is
    > a strong proponent of new filesystems, and I think that it accurately
    > represents the future direction of the Linux kernel.
    
    You're missing the point.  I want SE Linux working on other platforms NOW.
    
    I have already invented my own syscall numbers for other platforms to get this 
    working.  I've attached the relevant kernel patch.
    
    -- 
    http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
    http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
    http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
    http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 09 2002 - 03:07:45 PST