Re: LSM adapted to support XFS

Previous message: wwat_private: "新年快乐！Happy New Year！"
Next in thread: Stephen D. Smalley: "Re: LSM adapted to support XFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

sdsat_private

> sorry to have let you wait. But I took some time to build a new patch,
> this time based upon the latest BitKeeper tree, and adapted to be
> applicable to an XFS-enabled kernel (which by itself has additional
> enhancements like lm_sensors, ACPI, some bugfixes and so forth).
> 
> I have included the new patch, too.
> 
> Please find attached the Oops output, together with the ksymoops
> information.

We've reproduced this Oops with the vanilla LSM patch plus the SELinux patch.  I 
had thought that this was fixed by the earlier patch for allocating security 
structures for private files, but it seems to have resurfaced.  We'll have to 
investigate the cause.

--
Stephen Smalley, NSA
sdsat_private

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module