On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:18, Crispin Cowan wrote: > Stacking (say) LIDS with SELinux makes no sense. Stacking OWLSM (bunch > of pathology prevention policies) with an access control engine like > SELinux makes sense. I agree totally. SE Linux and OWL is something that I would really like to have working. I will do the testing if someone else does the kernel coding. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 19 2002 - 19:36:22 PST