> Of the other in-tree security modules, the only one that will be affected by the > removal of inode_post_lookup is DTE. I would expect that Serge would want to I've looked through lxr, and it looks like i can get all the data I need at d_instantiate to make a decision. Of course, what I don't know is whether it will be too early in the dentry setup. But I've been having trouble getting 2.5 to compile on my laptop even without any lsm modules, so I haven't been able to test. I'll get back at it when I get home tomorrow afternoon. > is likely to be able to work on it. I may be able to provide an initial cut at > a d_instantiate hook for DTE, but can't really vouch for its correctness. Side If you release this week, that'll be appreciated. > note: DTE doesn't compile in the 2.5 tree at present due to the sys_security > removal and header file issues. I can fix the compilation problems, but > deciding how to address the sys_security removal for DTE is naturally up to > Serge. I guess it's time to look into an fs solution. -serge _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Dec 31 2002 - 15:18:20 PST