Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59

Previous message: Russell Coker: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59"
In reply to: Russell Coker: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59"
Next in thread: Russell Coker: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59"
Reply: Russell Coker: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hchat_private

On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:39:39AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > What's the reason you can't just live with DAC for sysctls?
> 
> What exactly do you mean by "live with DAC" in this context?  If you mean 
> "allow UID==0 processes to do whatever they like" then it's not going to work 
> for any sort of chroot setup.

This means check the unix file permissions / ACLs only overriden by
CAP_FOWNER processes.

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module