Re: [patch] directly include security.h

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 23:27:48 PST

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch] Use CONFIG_SECURITY for clone_sk/clone_tcp_sk definition"

    * Stephen D. Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote:
    > 
    > configurable.  Any objections to fixing the networking files that
    > contain LSM hook calls to always directly include security.h?  The two
    > attached patches contain the necessary changes for lsm-2.4 and
    > lsm-2.5.  I suppose we might also want to directly include it in
    > net/tcp.h for the open request hook calls in that file; it is also
    > relying on the sock.h include.
    
    Nice clean up, thanks.  Since net/sock.h and net/tcp.h appear to be the
    only files with inlined functions calling security_ops, I think it's
    reasonable to add the include for security.h.
    
    cheers,
    -chris
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 23:29:54 PST