Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux

Valdis.Kletnieksat_private

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:29:57 +1100, Leigh Purdie said:

> I'm not sure that hostile would be the right word, but if he questions
> the usefulness of putting a large number of fairly intrusive hooks into
> the kernel, just to support auditing, he's quite right to do so! :)

We recently had a rework of the LSM code such that it added zero executable
unless you asked for LSM in the .config.  Would Linus be more receptive
if audit was similarly implemented?
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech