Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Wed Jan 29 2003 - 19:34:30 PST

  • Next message: Seth Arnold: "Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux"

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:29:57 +1100, Leigh Purdie said:
    > I'm not sure that hostile would be the right word, but if he questions
    > the usefulness of putting a large number of fairly intrusive hooks into
    > the kernel, just to support auditing, he's quite right to do so! :)
    We recently had a rework of the LSM code such that it added zero executable
    unless you asked for LSM in the .config.  Would Linus be more receptive
    if audit was similarly implemented?
    				Valdis Kletnieks
    				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
    				Virginia Tech

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jan 29 2003 - 19:35:39 PST