Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux

Previous message: bigat_private: "Re: Sample"
In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: c2 (or c2-like) auditing for Linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Valdis.Kletnieksat_private

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 21:35:25 PST, Seth Arnold <sarnoldat_private>  said:

> (To directly answer your question: I think the only way Linus would ever
> consider adding auditing callbacks would be if they made no binary size
> or performance penalties except for those interested in paying the price.)

And I'm perfectly happy with that, because that is a reasonable attitude
for Linus to take.  Now to figure out what '#ifdef CONFIG_C2_AUDIT' magic
is needed for that to happen... :)