Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I still don't see the issue of each LSM module having to duplicate the list > of sysctls beeing addressed. Coul you please work something out for that > before sending it for inclusion? I already responded to this concern in http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104316038729345&w=2 and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=104316278400987&w=2. At most, a field might be added to the ctl_table structure so that the kernel can provide a hint to security modules as to its view of the sensitivity of a given sysctl variable, but this does not require any change to the sysctl hook interface. -- Stephen Smalley, NSA sdsat_private _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 05:38:34 PST