Re: lsm truly "generic" allowing complete choice? Clean? Simple? I don't think so.

From: Christoph Hellwig (hchat_private)
Date: Wed Feb 12 2003 - 03:46:17 PST

  • Next message: Pete Loscocco: "Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59"

    On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:13:55PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Russell Coker
    > > 
    > > I think that most people who want to use LSM and similar 
    > > systems don't want to 
    > > re-write any significant portion of their applications.  
    > ---
    > 	I would agree -- that is true for _most_ people.
    
    This is eactly the wrong attitude.  You need to carefull design an audit
    all application for a secure system.
    
    > 	Maybe I'd be able to configure out paging support as well..
    
    That's CONFIG_SWAP in Linux 2.5..
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Feb 12 2003 - 03:46:44 PST