Re: OWL module implementation

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 13:30:37 PST

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: OWL module implementation"

    On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:26:29 +0100, Jonathan Heusser <jonnyat_private>  said:
    > Hello,
    > 
    > While looking through the code of the 'openwall'-module of LSM I wondered
    > why there aren't all the features implemented which the real openwall 
    > kernel patch provides?
    > (in other words: non-exec user stack, restricted /proc, [more?]).
    
    A lot of these (non-exec user stack for example) aren't done in the
    context of exits, and thus need additional patching.
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Mar 25 2003 - 13:31:09 PST