On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 02:35:59PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > The idea of using separate attribute names for each security module was > already discussed at length when I posted the original RFC, and I've > already made the case that this is not desirable. Please see the > earlier discussion. No. It's not acceptable that the same ondisk structure has a different meaning depending on loaded modules. If the xattrs have a different meaning they _must_ have a different name. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 11:43:13 PDT