On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:20:00PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * Andi Kleen (akat_private) wrote: > > > > It would work for x86-64. But why can't you use core_initcall() or > > postcore_initcall() ? > > This is too late. Those are just for order in do_initcalls() which is > well after some kernel threads have been created and filesystems have been > mounted, etc. This patch allows statically linked modules to catch > the creation of such kernel objects and give them all consistent labels. I would give them a generic name then in case someone else needs that too, like "early_initcalls" May be useful for some architecture initialization for example. -Andi _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 12 2003 - 22:28:58 PDT