* Christoph Hellwig (hchat_private) wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:20:00PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > This is too late. Those are just for order in do_initcalls() which is > > well after some kernel threads have been created and filesystems have been > > mounted, etc. This patch allows statically linked modules to catch > > the creation of such kernel objects and give them all consistent labels. > > Patch looks fine to me. Could you please make the initcalls mandatory > for security modules and remove the module exports for the regioster > functions so peop can't do the crappy check for each module whether it's > already initialized stuff the early selinux for LSM versions did? I absolutely agree the preconditions aren't nice, but not all security modules need them. I don't think disabling dynamic loading needs to be a requirement for the initcall. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 19 2003 - 18:00:32 PDT