On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Makan Pourzandi wrote: > > Actually, digsig is a complete > re-imlpementation. We began from the scratch. We had a look on the > CryptoMark source code and we decided not to use your code for several > reasons. At the time we began the development (several months ago), it > was not clear to us if this code is maintained or not (I believe that > code has not been changed since 2001, we wanted to use the latest crypto > modifications in linux kernel, our code uses the cryptoAPI in the kernel > 2.5.X series). I've been keeping the CryptoMark patch up to date in the 2.4 kernel tree at: bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/cryptomark-2.4 But yes, I agree with your decision to throw it all away and do it yourself :) At first glance at your code, nice job, it looks very good. But it doesn't build against a 2.6.0-test5 kernel :( thanks, greg k-h
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 18 2003 - 11:01:34 PDT