Re: [PATCH] Backport of Process Attribute API for Security Modules

From: Chris Wright (chrisw@private)
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 23:21:52 PDT

Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Backport of security_inode_post_setxattr hook"

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Pass nameidata to security_inode_permission hook"
In reply to: James Carter: "[PATCH] Backport of Process Attribute API for Security Modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* James Carter (jwcart2@private) wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will ask Steve to merge it.

Looks fine to me.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Backport of security_inode_post_setxattr hook"
Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Pass nameidata to security_inode_permission hook"
In reply to: James Carter: "[PATCH] Backport of Process Attribute API for Security Modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 29 2003 - 23:22:32 PDT