Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@private
Date: Thu Nov 27 2003 - 17:06:57 PST

Next message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM"

Previous message: Jonathan Boler: "File access control"
In reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 08:53:00 EST, "Serge E. Hallyn" said:

> As for the settime hook, securelevel only refuses decrement of the
> system clock.  That can't be mimicked with the capability hooks, can
> it?  It would have to refuse all CAP_SYS_TIME calls.

Hmm... either I'm sleepy from too much turkey, or this would piss off
the ntpd process no end....

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Next message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM"
Previous message: Jonathan Boler: "File access control"
In reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Nov 27 2003 - 17:07:51 PST