Re: [PATCH] BSD Secure Levels LSM

From: Stephen Smalley (sds@private)
Date: Mon Dec 01 2003 - 05:59:10 PST

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: File access control" 

    On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 09:11, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Deciding on a "proper" location for lsm interaction would be a very good
> thing.
> 
> And sys/security seems about as intuitive as possible.

Last I looked, sysfs wasn't sufficient to implement the kind of
interface needed by SELinux for its policy API, which is why we
implemented selinuxfs instead (based on the example of nfsd,
at Al Viro's suggestion).

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds@private>
National Security Agency

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Dec 01 2003 - 06:00:15 PST