On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:06, Chris Wright <chrisw@private> wrote: > [ Cc: to selinux list, which is a better place to ask these question ] > > * Torben Krause (torben.krause@private) wrote: > > Here my Questions: > > > > Which kernel patch must i use for lsm, kernel-patch-2.4-oldlsm or > > kernel-patch-2.4-lsm ? And is there a for 2.4.23/woody ? > > > > Furthermore, i want to know whether i've understood the information on > > russel cokers webpage right: new SE Linux is only available to 2.4 as > > unstable (beside 2.6 kernel). Old SE Linux is available as unstable and > > stable to 2.4. > > > > Is that right ?!? > > Russell is the best person to answer this. Similar questions have been > asked on the selinux mailing list. I believe there is a current selinux > that is backported to 2.4 and available on Woody. According to Russell, > update /etc/apt/sources.list with: > deb http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/debian/ stable selinux main Brian is in the process of making that apt line work for new SE Linux, it used to have the old SE Linux while the new SE Linux could be obtained with the following APT line: deb http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/debian/ stable selinux main Also for kernel patches you can go to http://www.coker.com.au/newselinux/kern/ , however that requires the ACL patch package and the Debian kernel patch from Debian/unstable. This is OK as running a kernel compiled from the latest Debian kernel source on Debian/woody works fine. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 05 2004 - 20:39:47 PST