Re: Clarifications of LSM API

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@private
Date: Fri Jul 02 2004 - 13:43:47 PDT

Next message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"

Previous message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks@private: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Reply: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:25:41 EDT, Valdis.Kletnieks@private said:

> ISTR something about OWLSM also having a stacker issue if CONFIG_OWLSM_FD
> was defined - was that a blob-sharing thing, or something else?

Speaking of owlsm, is there a canonical place where it lives, or did it
fade out in the 2.5.52 kernel time frame?

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Next message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Previous message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks@private: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Reply: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: Clarifications of LSM API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 02 2004 - 13:44:17 PDT