Re: Mediating send_sigurg

From: Chris Wright (chrisw@private)
Date: Fri Aug 27 2004 - 12:49:58 PDT

Previous message: support@private: "$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!y%G!<%?!<F~NO#1#0(B$B#0#0K|7oO"B3F~2Y(B ( $B#2#0#0L>BgJg=8!*(B ) $B!y(B"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Mediating send_sigurg"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Mediating send_sigurg"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Mediating send_sigurg"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

* Stephen Smalley (sds@private) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed that send_sigurg is not being mediated at present by a LSM

send_sigurg() will call check_kill_permission() which checks
security_task_kill(), does this confuse the result at all?

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

Previous message: support@private: "$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!y%G!<%?!<F~NO#1#0(B$B#0#0K|7oO"B3F~2Y(B ( $B#2#0#0L>BgJg=8!*(B ) $B!y(B"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Mediating send_sigurg"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Mediating send_sigurg"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Mediating send_sigurg"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 27 2004 - 12:50:27 PDT