* John Johansen (johansen@private) wrote: > sigh it seems I posted the wrong patch file the one that got posted is > the one where I threw up my hands and swore about having to break the > lock as Stephan suggests. > > The actual patch adds an extra lock (I liked that a little better than > breaking the rq lock) in setscheduler and around the other points that > call __setschedule. Hmm, I didn't see this patch, but it's sounding like it won't fly. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Oct 20 2004 - 09:07:30 PDT