Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable

From: Serge E. Hallyn (hallyn@private)
Date: Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:32:23 PDT

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
In reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I would be far happier with the embedded header approach if we simply
> turned each ->security into a struct hlist_head.  How does this sound
> to people?

Huh, I guess that's actually what I did...  How about that.

As Stephen points out I used a "generic" wrapper to point to an LSM's
security data, so I will rewrite this patch to embed the wrapper.

thanks,
-serge

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
In reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:32:41 PDT