Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable

From: Stephen Smalley (sds@private)
Date: Wed Oct 27 2004 - 14:09:18 PDT

Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks@private: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Maybe in reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "[RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 17:16, Michael Dean wrote:
> what would it be like if we just used xfs and implemented SGI's
> ACL's.  Just brainstorming alternative to SE.

Sorry, what?  ACLs != MAC, and ext[23] support ACLs too.
ACLs vs. MAC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=104508693312829&w=2

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds@private>
National Security Agency

Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks@private: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Maybe in reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "[RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Replace security fields with hashtable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Oct 27 2004 - 14:13:14 PDT