Re: [RFC] [Stacking v4 1/3] New lsm chaining patch

From: Stephen Smalley (sds@private)
Date: Mon Dec 06 2004 - 13:19:58 PST

On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 17:31, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Oh, so in that case there would be no reason not to leave them as
> #defines as in the previous version?

My only goal was to get them out of security.h (and into a separate
header only included by security modules), to avoid having to rebuild
the entire kernel tree upon enabling/disabling stacker.  Whether they
are #define's or static inlines doesn't matter to me, although static
inlines are favored by Documentation/SubmittingPatches #3.

Stephen Smalley <sds@private>
National Security Agency

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Dec 06 2004 - 13:28:25 PST