On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 18:02, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Hmm, in order to know about the performance, I suppose stacker will need > to be tested with a version of SELinux patched to not call > dummy_security_ops as a secondary. Hopefully that will provide more > comparable results than the last run... Yes, and I'd also suggest changing all calls to the top-level capable() function within SELinux, capabilities, and dummy to instead only call their own foo_capable() functions. Otherwise, you are likely getting duplicate processing by each module when using stacker. -- Stephen Smalley <sds@private> National Security Agency
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Dec 07 2004 - 05:16:20 PST