> > Chris, > > For me the need for this patch was an LSM that I was working on which > > wanted to keep track of the system calls that a task called. This was the > > cleanest way for me do this. > > But what is wrong with the audit subsystem that is already in the kernel > tree? It should provide for this kind of notification, right? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Greg, There is nothing wrong with the audit subsystem. The only problem that I have is the lack of system-call sandboxing in LSM. -Adrian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Dec 08 2004 - 11:46:00 PST