Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@private
Date: Fri Jan 28 2005 - 10:53:53 PST

Previous message: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
In reply to: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Next in thread: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Reply: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:17:27 EST, John Richard Moser said:

> That's only used for non-error-returning functions.  I did say this was
> just academic, not serious.

My point was that inode_handle_create() probably *SHOULD* be able to
throw an error....

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Previous message: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
In reply to: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Next in thread: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Reply: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Jan 28 2005 - 10:54:19 PST