Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept

From: Greg KH (greg@private)
Date: Sat Jan 29 2005 - 10:02:58 PST

Previous message: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
In reply to: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Next in thread: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Reply: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:34:44PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> You found a bug, wow.

Hm, with comments like that, remind me not to review your code next
time.

greg k-h

Previous message: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
In reply to: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Next in thread: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Reply: John Richard Moser: "Re: Stacking LSM proof-of-concept"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sat Jan 29 2005 - 10:03:33 PST