My error then, thanks for the help. -- Christopher Warner On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 20:14 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (hallyn@private): > > The second error line implies you do in fact have another security module > > loaded, which is the primary. I'm guessing you have capabilities > > either compiled into the kernel, or loaded as a module? > > haha. why didn't I notice: > > > > However; > > > Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized > > > Capability LSM initialized > > Capability is your problem. > > -serge
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 16:02:19 PST