BSD Secure Levels Update: memory alloc failure check [4/8]

From: Michael Halcrow (mike@private)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2005 - 15:40:37 PST

Previous message: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: claim block dev in file struct rather than inode struct [3/8]"
In reply to: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: claim block dev in file struct rather than inode struct [3/8]"
Next in thread: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: allow setuid/setgid on process if root [5/8]"
Reply: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: allow setuid/setgid on process if root [5/8]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This is the fourth in a series of eight patches to the BSD Secure
Levels LSM.  It adds a check for a memory allocation failure
condition.  Thanks to Vesa-Matti J Kari for pointing out this problem.

Signed off by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@private>

text/plain attachment: seclvl_mem_alloc_check.patch

Previous message: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: claim block dev in file struct rather than inode struct [3/8]"
In reply to: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: claim block dev in file struct rather than inode struct [3/8]"
Next in thread: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: allow setuid/setgid on process if root [5/8]"
Reply: Michael Halcrow: "BSD Secure Levels Update: allow setuid/setgid on process if root [5/8]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Feb 03 2005 - 15:42:17 PST