Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)

From: Mark F. Haigh (Mark.Haigh@private)
Date: Wed Feb 09 2005 - 12:04:10 PST

Previous message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Chris Wright wrote:
<snip>
> 
> You missed one subtle point.  That failure case actually unaccts 0 pages
> (note the use of charge).  Not the nicest, but I believe correct.
> 

Right.  I did miss that.  Thanks for the explanations, Chris and Hugh, I 
appreciate it.

Mark F. Haigh
Mark.Haigh@private

Previous message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:48:10 PST