On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 12:48 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > www.sf.net/projects/lsm-stacker has a new update of the stacker > patches. I've gone back to most things lockless for the sake of > performance. See item # 4 under the updates for the RCU (-less) > info, and the file stacker_rcu_test.txt (in the latest > sourceforge release for some performance data) . See item # 2 for > the rwlock (-less) info. Both require some extra knowledge from > modules writers which is not yet reflected in > Documentation/security-stacking.txt. Also, does your performance data include a comparison of a vanilla 2.6.11-rc4-bk9 kernel (with SELinux+capabilities stacked in the existing manner) vs. with your patches and SELinux+cap_stack stacked via stacker? That is what we truly want to know - what overhead will this impose on existing SELinux systems. -- Stephen Smalley <sds@private> National Security Agency
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Feb 22 2005 - 07:56:34 PST