On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 08:40 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 18:10 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > On www.sf.net/projects/lsm-stacker there is a new stacker release. > > Naturally down for maintenance. Argh. In the meantime, I am attaching the files: include/linux/security-stack.h security/stacker.c security/security.c > > Some > > performance results on x86 are attached. To summarize: > > > > Plain Stack > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > unixbench final score: 520.9 522.6 > > dbench avg 10 runs: 198 stdev 1 205 stdev 1 > > hackbench: 17 stdev 5 18 stdev 7 > > kernbench (sys time): 28.45 stdev .04 28.35 stdev .08 > > > > So hackbench is the only one which is not actually faster with stacking. > > Always good when additional processing makes things go faster ;) > Any progress on getting the tests run via the IBM test harness, > including profiling data too? Not yet. I plan to start a new attempt today. > Any testing of the scalability impact of the patch, e.g. on a large SMP > box? Hopefully that will come with using the test harness. I'll create a few partitions with varying # cpus. Unfortunately for me, that will then be ppc, not x86, where I have always gotten worse stacker performance results... thanks, -serge -- Serge Hallyn <serue@private>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Apr 18 2005 - 07:35:29 PDT