On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:32:31PM -0400, James Morris wrote: > It's a burden in that it needs to be taken into account by several core > and other kernel maintainers when they modify the kernel or review patches > which modify the kernel. If SELinux is to be the only user, then it's > difficult to justify the continued presence of the LSM code. But the LSM hooks aren't going to just dissapear. Under what you propose they will be replaced by other SELinux specific calls. How does this change the impact to core/other kernel maintainers when they make changes? They are still going to be faced with making changes near call points whose purpose they may not be overly familiar with. Are you saying that the issue is the lack of availability of source for the LSM module? You've already said that as far as they are concerned SELinux is the only LSM module that matters and it's source is intree. Thanks Tony
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 18:42:23 PDT