RE: New stacker performance results

From: Colin Walters (walters@private)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 21:55:40 PDT

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 22:21 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:

> And I would argue that the additional time and complexity reflected not inherent
> complexity in the SELinux policy language, but the real complexity of the
> software you were trying to secure.

Definitely, that was the point I was trying to make; saying there are
always "17 steps" to developing a policy is rather meaningless.  It's
like saying with Java there are "23 steps" to developing a program and
with Python there are "39 steps".

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed May 25 2005 - 22:46:21 PDT