On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:39:01 CDT, serue@private said: > REAIM Workload > Times are in seconds - Child times from tms.cstime and tms.cutime > > nostack > > Num Parent Child Child Jobs per Jobs/min/ Std_dev Std_dev JTI > Forked Time SysTime UTime Minute Child Time Percent > 1 0.07 0.03 0.03 87428.57 87428.57 0.00 0.00 100 > 3 0.17 0.27 0.23 108000.00 36000.00 0.00 0.00 99 > 5 0.20 0.49 0.46 153000.00 30600.00 0.01 6.19 93 > 7 0.29 0.92 0.97 147724.14 21103.45 0.01 4.04 95 > 9 0.36 1.40 1.75 153000.00 17000.00 0.01 2.70 97 > Max Jobs per Minute 153000.00 > > stack: > > REAIM Workload > Times are in seconds - Child times from tms.cstime and tms.cutime > > Num Parent Child Child Jobs per Jobs/min/ Std_dev Std_dev JTI > Forked Time SysTime UTime Minute Child Time Percent > 1 0.07 0.04 0.03 87428.57 87428.57 0.00 0.00 100 > 3 0.18 0.30 0.22 102000.00 34000.00 nan nan -2147483648 > 5 0.21 0.52 0.50 145714.29 29142.86 0.00 1.98 98 > 7 0.30 1.06 0.99 142800.00 20400.00 0.01 3.01 96 > 9 0.36 1.59 1.55 153000.00 17000.00 0.01 2.85 97 > Max Jobs per Minute 153000.00 How many significant figures does this actually provide? I'm *very* leery of the fact that for 1, 9, and max, jobs/minute was identical (additionally, the values for 3 and 7 seem to point at only 2-3 significant digits). It's *very* hard to make any real conclusions about 2-3% performance hits (which is what the other numbers hint at) when you don't have enough significant digits in the number to accurately measure a 2% difference.....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 19:45:11 PDT