Re: RFC: jail functionality

From: James Morris (jmorris@private)
Date: Wed Jun 29 2005 - 11:03:10 PDT

Previous message: Tony Jones: "Re: stacker and vm_enough_memory"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Reply: serue@private: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> > The attached task-lookup patches?
> 
> Not sure it provides much value.

If yoy need this, why not look at proper isolation via Xen?

LSM is about access control, not virtualization.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@private>

Previous message: Tony Jones: "Re: stacker and vm_enough_memory"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Next in thread: serue@private: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Reply: serue@private: "Re: RFC: jail functionality"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Jun 29 2005 - 11:03:50 PDT