Re: [PATCH] add securityfs for all LSMs to use

From: Chris Wright (chrisw@private)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 10:57:08 PDT 

* Joshua Brindle (jbrindle@private) wrote:
> This looks like a great idea but shouldn't this be mounted in proc? lsm
> is very much about processes and very little about hardware, you'll end
> up with 2 nebulous filesystems by adding stuff to sys that belongs in
> proc.

There's attr bits in proc, and this is system level info.  So, I think it's
in the proper spot.

thanks,
-chris

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 10:57:47 PDT