Re: [RFC] [PATCH] add struct module to mod_reg_security args

• Previous message: serue@private: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] add struct module to mod_reg_security args"
• In reply to: serue@private: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] add struct module to mod_reg_security args"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 01:06:25PM -0500, serue@private wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH (greg@private):
> > No, why not just do like all other subsystems, put the struct module *
> > in the struct security_operations itself?
> 
> Oh...  I see, thanks.
> 
> Would the following be acceptable?
> 
> I'm only proposing this as another part of the stacker patchset -
> obviously if stacker doesn't go up, this patch wouldn't be needed.

Looks good to me.  You also get the advantage of being able to get a
symlink to /sys/module/LSM_MODULE_NAME with this patch.

thanks,

greg k-h

• Previous message: serue@private: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] add struct module to mod_reg_security args"
• In reply to: serue@private: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] add struct module to mod_reg_security args"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun Jul 17 2005 - 11:32:03 PDT