Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs

From: Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com)
Date: Mon Jul 25 2005 - 08:51:44 PDT

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

--- Stephen Smalley <sds@private> wrote:

> I haven't seen any discussion of the optional
> variant described above,
> which I actually expected to provoke the most
> discussion.  Any strong
> opinions on it?

Yes. Don't do it. The same arguments apply.

Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com

____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Generic fallback for security xattrs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 10:39:21 PDT