Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@private)
Date: Mon Aug 22 2005 - 13:38:00 PDT

Previous message: vivek relan: "About LSM ......."
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:30:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk (bunk@private) wrote:
> >  config SECURITY
> >  	bool "Enable different security models"
> > +	depends on SYSFS
> 
> Hmm, what about select instead?

I have no strong opinion on this, especially since this is only an issue 
in the COMFIG_EMBEDDED=y case.

> thanks,
> -chris

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Previous message: vivek relan: "About LSM ......."
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Aug 22 2005 - 13:38:23 PDT