Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates

From: James Morris (jmorris@private)
Date: Wed Aug 24 2005 - 21:39:49 PDT


On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:

> This is based on Kurt's original work.  The net effect is that
> LSM hooks are called conditionally, and in all cases capabilities
> provide the defaults.  I've done some basic performance testing, and
> found nothing surprising.

Do you mean nothing noticable?

>  I'm interested to see numbers from others
> before I push this up.  These are against Linus' current git tree (they
> will clash with the -mm tree).

Are there any numbers for popular architectures like i386 and x86_64?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@private>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Aug 24 2005 - 21:40:11 PDT