Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules

From: James Morris (jmorris@private)
Date: Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:02:01 PDT

Previous message: David Safford: "[RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
In reply to: David Safford: "[RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Next in thread: David Safford: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Next in thread: schaufler-ca.com - Casey Schaufler: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Reply: David Safford: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, David Safford wrote:

> SLIM provides a simple integrity mandatory access control, similar
> to LOMAC, but using EVM information to aid decisions, and to ensure
> the integrity of guard processes.

Can you explain why the Linux kernel needs SLIM when SELinux already 
provides MAC and integrity control?

- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@private>

Previous message: David Safford: "[RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
In reply to: David Safford: "[RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Next in thread: David Safford: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Next in thread: schaufler-ca.com - Casey Schaufler: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Reply: David Safford: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:03:17 PDT