Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules

From: schaufler-ca.com - Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com)
Date: Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:23:16 PDT


> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:41:01 -0400 (EDT)
> From: James Morris <jmorris@private>
> To: "schaufler-ca.com - Casey Schaufler"
> <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> CC: linux-security-module@private
> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] EVM and SLIM LSM modules

> Which achieves what, exactly?

Some valueable policy that the developer wants.
Why are you jumping all over it? There was
considerable hew and cry a while back that there
were no policies other than SELinux available
for LSM. Well, here are two. Gawd, I hope we
don't replay that same arguements from the
last go-round.

------------------------
Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
650.906.1780



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Oct 17 2005 - 16:23:32 PDT