On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 8:16 am, Stephen Smalley wrote: > I know that you said you wanted to look at something simpler than > SELinux, but did you look at the tech report on the implementation of > SELinux as a LSM? > http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/papers/module/t1.html > > SELinux may be a little difficult to get into, but it should serve as a > good example for you; it has been subjected to a lot of scrutiny by > virtue of being in the mainline kernel, and it provides very extensive > coverage. > Just to be sure I'm clear, I have nothing against selinux as a system, but the code is fairly extensive and so much more than what I'm trying to do that its a little further into the deep end than I want to jump at the moment from a learning perspective. Thanks for the pointer to auditd by the way, ill take a look at it. Not sure how I missed that one.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 15:51:57 PDT