On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Stephen Smalley wrote: > We then end up with only one new LSM here (SLIM) and two support > libraries. At which point the only motivator for stacker is combining > SLIM and SELinux without directly coupling them. I'm not clear on why we'd need SLIM when we have SELinux. How difficult would it be to implement a LOMAC policy in SELinux? - James -- James Morris <jmorris@private>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Nov 17 2005 - 13:28:09 PST