Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such

From: Rich Salz (rsalzat_private)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 08:48:10 PDT

Next message: Tina Bird: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"

Previous message: Jose Nazario: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
In reply to: todd glassey: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Next in thread: Corey Steele: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ah, maybe Todd.

I recall a recent disputation of this point by Chuck Miller on the ABA
list. :)

The world is messy, and the legal system knows how to handle that.  It's
amazing how well thing work without "strict evidentiary agents."  And
saying that the log itself testifies, rather than the admin who operates
it; nonsense.  The operator will always be called to testify, if only to
state that they followed the documented procedure.

-- 
Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
http://www.zolera.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Tina Bird: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Previous message: Jose Nazario: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
In reply to: todd glassey: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Next in thread: Corey Steele: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 09:41:27 PDT