Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such

From: Mordechai T. Abzug (mortyat_private)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 10:04:09 PDT

Next message: Ed Ravin: "Re: [loganalysis] Re: Central syslog server best practices?"

Previous message: Tina Bird: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
In reply to: todd glassey: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Next in thread: Been Reading Your Logs Lately?: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Next in thread: Corey Steele: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Reply: Been Reading Your Logs Lately?: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 05:03:54PM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
> As long as we are going to this level of trouble we need a reliable
> timestamp process with a traceable source of time so that logging data can
> be compared to other logging data.

You mean like the NTP protocol family?  There's no reason to come up
with a problem-specific solution when there's already a general
solution.

- Morty

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

Next message: Ed Ravin: "Re: [loganalysis] Re: Central syslog server best practices?"
Previous message: Tina Bird: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
In reply to: todd glassey: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Next in thread: Been Reading Your Logs Lately?: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Next in thread: Corey Steele: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Reply: Been Reading Your Logs Lately?: "Re: [loganalysis] Logging standards and such"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 10:18:06 PDT