Re: [loganalysis] smart alerting from log analysis

From: sween (sweenat_private)
Date: Sun Aug 26 2001 - 08:05:10 PDT

  • Next message: Jason Lewis: "RE: [loganalysis] stopping/starting swatchn" 

    > I know I'd be interested in at least seeing it.
I second this.


On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Serge Wroclawski wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Nate Campi wrote:
> 
> > What I'm wondering is how many other people have grown their own
> > escalation system, and if this should start being shared on this list as
> > well. The handling of the alerts is just as important as generating the
> > alerts in the first place, IMHO.
> >
> > I'd actually be happy to look at other people's implementions, either to
> > improve ours or ditch it for something better.
> 
> Well, if you are legally allowed to distribute it and have it so that
> people can use it/modify it to thier needs, I can't see a reason why you
> shouldn't make a web site about it, post a mail about it, and see what
> happens.
> 

> 
> - Serge Wroclawski
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
> For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
> 
> 
> 


--

 ---  -sween                               
| M | http://www.modelm.org                 
 ---  "force feedback computing since 1984."
<meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="TRUE">


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Aug 26 2001 - 07:59:43 PDT